"... human beings are inescapably alone, and therein lies their tragedy" - Richard Yates
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Alas for Bangalore!!!
As a Madras-Born, Chennai-bred, temporary Bangalorean, I have to confess this is not my favourite city. I haven't ever felt comfortable without my movies, my marina, my mozhi (language)! But, one thing I have always been grateful to Bangalore and its people is, that I've felt safe in this city, as I have never felt in my own. As a single woman living alone, I have taken comfort from the fact that B'lore leaves me be; lets me fulfill my days activities alone, without having to hide from predatory Indian men.
I have dined alone (upaharas to upmarket fine dining); shopped (only) alone; watched movies alone; hung out in malls alone; sat at ulsoor lake for long hours gazing at the water....you guessed it...alone! All of this...in a very satisfying solitude...no intrusions...no rubbing up...no groping...no staring. How sweet is that! I adored this city that never turned an eye whatever you wore...didnt think it odd for a single woman in her twenties (yes! yes! I'm still there!) to go for a movie and return home at 1 in the night.
All of this...till recently. First , I couldn't go to a pub without worrying who would walk in and assault (irrespective of my male friends - they cant beat up ppl). Then, I couldn't decide on what festivals I wanted to celebrate - Valentines day, which was abhorrent till now, now became a choice I didnt have! Then, I couldn't speak to men of a different religion! Now, it turns out I can't wear "Western" clothes anymore - so even what I wear is not my choice anymore.
Women are being assaulted (yes...means hit!) in broad daylight, in the middle of the city, even inside a car...for wearing "Western" clothes!! Not even "revealing" clothes - thats an old one - but trousers and a "kurta". Women have been told "you can't walk alone"!! The people of this city have stood around watching this violence. The government in this state can no longer guarantee the safety of half its earning, educated, tax-paying population.
Don't drink, don't show any skin, wear only saris/Indian clothes, don't go out alone, don't talk to men, don't step out of the house without male protection!!! Do I hear the word Taliban somewhere???? Actually not, I don't think Taliban - they don't want their women to work or earn their keep (they make them do housework ofcourse!). We are INDIAN see...so these women need to work, they need to manage the house...they need to be up for sex on demand (from man), they need to work easy times but earn more...but they need to be dumb, mute, submissive, all-accepting, BODIES. Equal rights????????? Indian constitution??? Whats that???
I have dined alone (upaharas to upmarket fine dining); shopped (only) alone; watched movies alone; hung out in malls alone; sat at ulsoor lake for long hours gazing at the water....you guessed it...alone! All of this...in a very satisfying solitude...no intrusions...no rubbing up...no groping...no staring. How sweet is that! I adored this city that never turned an eye whatever you wore...didnt think it odd for a single woman in her twenties (yes! yes! I'm still there!) to go for a movie and return home at 1 in the night.
All of this...till recently. First , I couldn't go to a pub without worrying who would walk in and assault (irrespective of my male friends - they cant beat up ppl). Then, I couldn't decide on what festivals I wanted to celebrate - Valentines day, which was abhorrent till now, now became a choice I didnt have! Then, I couldn't speak to men of a different religion! Now, it turns out I can't wear "Western" clothes anymore - so even what I wear is not my choice anymore.
Women are being assaulted (yes...means hit!) in broad daylight, in the middle of the city, even inside a car...for wearing "Western" clothes!! Not even "revealing" clothes - thats an old one - but trousers and a "kurta". Women have been told "you can't walk alone"!! The people of this city have stood around watching this violence. The government in this state can no longer guarantee the safety of half its earning, educated, tax-paying population.
Don't drink, don't show any skin, wear only saris/Indian clothes, don't go out alone, don't talk to men, don't step out of the house without male protection!!! Do I hear the word Taliban somewhere???? Actually not, I don't think Taliban - they don't want their women to work or earn their keep (they make them do housework ofcourse!). We are INDIAN see...so these women need to work, they need to manage the house...they need to be up for sex on demand (from man), they need to work easy times but earn more...but they need to be dumb, mute, submissive, all-accepting, BODIES. Equal rights????????? Indian constitution??? Whats that???
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Movies...Frost/Nixon
Frost/Nixon: Stg. Michael Sheen, Frank Langhella. Dir. Ron Howard
Richard Nixon, arguably America''s most controversial President, chose David Frost, a comic talk-show host with a breezy, light-hearted presence, for his first televised presence after resigning. Presumably, Nixon (and his advisers) thought Frost, not a hard-nosed journalist would do a soft, human-interest story that would bring back into focus Nixon's presidency and the good he had done to America rather than the last 6 months of Watergate.
Frost's interest in doing a Nixon story surprised many people including his closest friend and eventual producer John Birt. What they hadn't accounted for was his compulsive need to be in the spotlight, to be considered "successful". He had been to the US, had tasted sweet success, had used Sardi's as his "canteen", was part of the glamourous social circuit of New York. To have that taken away, and more importantly to contemplate never having it back was too much for Frost. So he gambles his entire savings, and borrows a lot more, to tempt Nixon.
The research team on the other hand, are committed to giving Nixon "the trial he never had". Played by Sam Rockwell and Richard Platt, this team puts their reputations and careers on hold to dig out every possible conversation Nixon might have had, every change in tone, every move his associates have made, so that Nixon can be ensnared.
Frost/Nixon is an adaptation of a successful Broadway play featuring the same cast. The transition from stage to film has been very well done, with Peter Morgan (The Queen, Last King...) doing the screenplay. The movie moves from the gloomily languorous pace of a deposed President's life to the frenetic commitment of Frost's research team. Frost, doing it for the eyeballs and the fame, he thinks it will bring him, is toyed with, by a crafty President determined to "head back East". Nixon, enjoys the game, a chance to be back in the spotlight, be vindicated. The lead up to the Watergate showdown, the sobering up of Frost with a prod from unexpected quarters to the climactic close-up of a president uncovered for the world to see, form this gripping tale.
Frank Langhella as Nixon is superb! Not very many actors can stand up to very close scrutiny on film. But Mr Langhella's face twitches, his eyes dart, his upper lip sweats (like Nixon) and he ages through the interview. Every inch the haughty president, when he says "if the president does it, it is not illegal"...you almost want to beleive it. In his eyes, you see the desperation and hunger of a deposed President. In his gait, you see confidence, a security in his place in the world, which is quickly demolished on TV. Micheal Sheen is good as well, as a Frost, who may have outreached himself with this interview. Used to adulation, he is thrown by Nixon's condescention, unnerved by the Prez's rambling. Mr Sheen is believably awkward, when Nixon casually insults him and downright afraid when he realises he "has to get to work".
Frost/Nixon is at a decent pace, with much of the action happening indoors. We don't feel claustrophobic, thanks to the screenplay and the acting. The supporting cast, including Kevin Bacon as a devoted Nixon CoS, are uniformly competent and provide some much needed moments of levity. Its a masterful piece of story-telling that shows the world the power of television anew...of all the more relevance in an age of reality shows and instant gratification.
Richard Nixon, arguably America''s most controversial President, chose David Frost, a comic talk-show host with a breezy, light-hearted presence, for his first televised presence after resigning. Presumably, Nixon (and his advisers) thought Frost, not a hard-nosed journalist would do a soft, human-interest story that would bring back into focus Nixon's presidency and the good he had done to America rather than the last 6 months of Watergate.
Frost's interest in doing a Nixon story surprised many people including his closest friend and eventual producer John Birt. What they hadn't accounted for was his compulsive need to be in the spotlight, to be considered "successful". He had been to the US, had tasted sweet success, had used Sardi's as his "canteen", was part of the glamourous social circuit of New York. To have that taken away, and more importantly to contemplate never having it back was too much for Frost. So he gambles his entire savings, and borrows a lot more, to tempt Nixon.
The research team on the other hand, are committed to giving Nixon "the trial he never had". Played by Sam Rockwell and Richard Platt, this team puts their reputations and careers on hold to dig out every possible conversation Nixon might have had, every change in tone, every move his associates have made, so that Nixon can be ensnared.
Frost/Nixon is an adaptation of a successful Broadway play featuring the same cast. The transition from stage to film has been very well done, with Peter Morgan (The Queen, Last King...) doing the screenplay. The movie moves from the gloomily languorous pace of a deposed President's life to the frenetic commitment of Frost's research team. Frost, doing it for the eyeballs and the fame, he thinks it will bring him, is toyed with, by a crafty President determined to "head back East". Nixon, enjoys the game, a chance to be back in the spotlight, be vindicated. The lead up to the Watergate showdown, the sobering up of Frost with a prod from unexpected quarters to the climactic close-up of a president uncovered for the world to see, form this gripping tale.
Frank Langhella as Nixon is superb! Not very many actors can stand up to very close scrutiny on film. But Mr Langhella's face twitches, his eyes dart, his upper lip sweats (like Nixon) and he ages through the interview. Every inch the haughty president, when he says "if the president does it, it is not illegal"...you almost want to beleive it. In his eyes, you see the desperation and hunger of a deposed President. In his gait, you see confidence, a security in his place in the world, which is quickly demolished on TV. Micheal Sheen is good as well, as a Frost, who may have outreached himself with this interview. Used to adulation, he is thrown by Nixon's condescention, unnerved by the Prez's rambling. Mr Sheen is believably awkward, when Nixon casually insults him and downright afraid when he realises he "has to get to work".
Frost/Nixon is at a decent pace, with much of the action happening indoors. We don't feel claustrophobic, thanks to the screenplay and the acting. The supporting cast, including Kevin Bacon as a devoted Nixon CoS, are uniformly competent and provide some much needed moments of levity. Its a masterful piece of story-telling that shows the world the power of television anew...of all the more relevance in an age of reality shows and instant gratification.
Movies...Revolutionary Road
I've been watching a fair number of movies the past couple of weeks. Have been thinking I should write something, NOT a review, about them. So here goes nothing...
Revolutionary Road : Cast - Kate Winslet; Leonardo DiCaprio
Adapted from a novel by Richard Yates, this Sam Mendes movie stars "Kate and Leo", as a sub-urban couple. Part of a conventional society, Kate, an aspiring-actress-turned-suburban-mom, feels stifled and longs to break out and chase a dream. The problem - Leo, who it turns out, no longer wants to run with her. Thats putting it simplistically...actually he does agree to give it all up and move to Paris, and they spend couple of months in pleasurable anticipation. Leo enjoys shocking the neighbourhood but not his colleagues ribbing him about being a "kept" man. Kate, thrills at the prospect of being unconventional, booking tickets with enthusiasm, learning French, planning a secretarial job. Pregnancy, a promotion on the job, put the brakes on this plan, forcing the couple to assess their motivations, resulting in tragic consequences.
Kate Winslet is superb, as the young girl, who got lost in the wife and mother. We realise early on, she doesn't have the talent, but she doesn't ask herself this question - perhaps the answer is too obvious to bear. She struggles to assuage the guilt he heaps on her - "You are a mother, how can you think of abortion?". Hunted down by conventions, strangled by routine, smacked in the face by life's surprises, she fights and struggles and kicks, only to hurt herself.
Leo DiCaprio is effortlessly good, as the husband, who sees his wife, his love, going off the deep end, destroying herself and them, and is helpless to arrest it. He can't understand her struggle, he doesn't want to! He asks the question so many men have asked their vagrant wives, "Why can't you be happy, like the rest of us?". They have a house, kids, money, sex- what more would a woman want?! He fights the distance she puts between them, only to lose and find comfort with another.
This is one movie where the fights are real, screaming, gut-wrenching! Sam Mendes shows what many of us have seen, a marriage unravelling. Lovers turn strangers, children turn burdens and society turns into a millstone. Kate Winslet pleads with her husband "Please...Please ...tell me we can have this child in Paris", even as she knows he can't/won't. The only person who seems to make "sense" of this situation, is the psychologically ill, returned-from-san neighbour. Perhaps that pushes her over the brink - insanity seems to be her only living refuge.
Revolutionary Road : Cast - Kate Winslet; Leonardo DiCaprio
Adapted from a novel by Richard Yates, this Sam Mendes movie stars "Kate and Leo", as a sub-urban couple. Part of a conventional society, Kate, an aspiring-actress-turned-suburban-mom, feels stifled and longs to break out and chase a dream. The problem - Leo, who it turns out, no longer wants to run with her. Thats putting it simplistically...actually he does agree to give it all up and move to Paris, and they spend couple of months in pleasurable anticipation. Leo enjoys shocking the neighbourhood but not his colleagues ribbing him about being a "kept" man. Kate, thrills at the prospect of being unconventional, booking tickets with enthusiasm, learning French, planning a secretarial job. Pregnancy, a promotion on the job, put the brakes on this plan, forcing the couple to assess their motivations, resulting in tragic consequences.
Kate Winslet is superb, as the young girl, who got lost in the wife and mother. We realise early on, she doesn't have the talent, but she doesn't ask herself this question - perhaps the answer is too obvious to bear. She struggles to assuage the guilt he heaps on her - "You are a mother, how can you think of abortion?". Hunted down by conventions, strangled by routine, smacked in the face by life's surprises, she fights and struggles and kicks, only to hurt herself.
Leo DiCaprio is effortlessly good, as the husband, who sees his wife, his love, going off the deep end, destroying herself and them, and is helpless to arrest it. He can't understand her struggle, he doesn't want to! He asks the question so many men have asked their vagrant wives, "Why can't you be happy, like the rest of us?". They have a house, kids, money, sex- what more would a woman want?! He fights the distance she puts between them, only to lose and find comfort with another.
This is one movie where the fights are real, screaming, gut-wrenching! Sam Mendes shows what many of us have seen, a marriage unravelling. Lovers turn strangers, children turn burdens and society turns into a millstone. Kate Winslet pleads with her husband "Please...Please ...tell me we can have this child in Paris", even as she knows he can't/won't. The only person who seems to make "sense" of this situation, is the psychologically ill, returned-from-san neighbour. Perhaps that pushes her over the brink - insanity seems to be her only living refuge.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Friday, October 31, 2008
Whats right, whats wrong and a disaster waiting to happen...
Life has a way of getting complicated, just when it seems to have sorted itself out. For a change, the personal and the professional parts of life were chugging along just fine - I was finally making some commissions as a sales person and the personal part, while not exactly happy, had hit status quo. With a mind like mine, and the ability to f%^k up most things that come within 10 feet of me...I couldn't ask for more.
But, no! I manage to go and find trouble...I chose this year's account set, fought for it even, only for a financial crisis and takeover woes to ensure I hit an all-time unmentionable low on sales numbers - bang! there goes 50% of my already paltry salary. This alone is usually enough to make me let go of the edge of sanity that I always seem to cling to...but things never happen alone, do they?
I've let my feelings get the better of me, and hurt some of the people closest to me...hurt them by using them most unfairly, just because I want every need assuaged immediately. If that doesn't happen, I turn bitter and hurtful... stuff inherently wrong. I've never had much of a concept of right and wrong, and pretty much anything goes is what I have always maintained. Only, I have never had much cause to ponder right or wrong - one needs to actually do something to think of whether its right or wrong! I now have a strong urge to do the right thing by the people that matter most to me...only to find that its complicating life even more and now I have a line to tread that I never knew existed. What does it make me do...swing wildly!! One day, I tell myself, I will do the right thing...I will not let my feelings get away with it! By end of day, I have done exactly that, and done exactly the thing I set out not to do...hurt people!!! I should be shut off...straitjacketed and put away for good...for everybody's good!!!
Voluntary Lobotomy candidate available - any takers????
But, no! I manage to go and find trouble...I chose this year's account set, fought for it even, only for a financial crisis and takeover woes to ensure I hit an all-time unmentionable low on sales numbers - bang! there goes 50% of my already paltry salary. This alone is usually enough to make me let go of the edge of sanity that I always seem to cling to...but things never happen alone, do they?
I've let my feelings get the better of me, and hurt some of the people closest to me...hurt them by using them most unfairly, just because I want every need assuaged immediately. If that doesn't happen, I turn bitter and hurtful... stuff inherently wrong. I've never had much of a concept of right and wrong, and pretty much anything goes is what I have always maintained. Only, I have never had much cause to ponder right or wrong - one needs to actually do something to think of whether its right or wrong! I now have a strong urge to do the right thing by the people that matter most to me...only to find that its complicating life even more and now I have a line to tread that I never knew existed. What does it make me do...swing wildly!! One day, I tell myself, I will do the right thing...I will not let my feelings get away with it! By end of day, I have done exactly that, and done exactly the thing I set out not to do...hurt people!!! I should be shut off...straitjacketed and put away for good...for everybody's good!!!
Voluntary Lobotomy candidate available - any takers????
Monday, October 27, 2008
Meeting a friend's hubby-to-be
There are some social situations where not doing anything leaves you exhausted. You have to reign in your usual sparkling personality, put a lid on anything that might expose the inner workings of your demented mind, and most taxing of all...be nice. These situations usually involve meeting a new acquaintance, especially someone important to someone important to you. These are the times when you bemoan social niceties, lament your dependence on this person and your own inability to not care a hoot!But, then...the friend matters to you...more than all else. So you swallow pride, sarcasm all else that's abrasive about you, and become unrecognizable.
Certain of these awkward situations are better than others. Case in point, meeting a friend's parents. These are genuinely nice people, who themselves have no clue about their son/daughter's "activities" outside home, and who think that their son's friend should be a "nice" girl. Hardly the place to respond to blameless people who ask you "...so your parents must be looking for a boy for you.." with a snarling "...how does it matter to you whether I marry or not...bugger off!". So I usually try to look demure, smile (more like grimace) and say "yeah...they keep asking...but there's time...".
Other situations are painful - meeting a friend's boy/girl friend (who you instantly dislike), meeting the parents at places they wouldn't expect you (e.g. coming out of sex shop/casino/sexy lingerie shop). But most painful of all...is meeting your best (girl)friend's fiancee - hubby-to-be. This is when, you can't give any feedback to friend, can't prevent the worst from happening, can't tell her..."woman! the man's not our type". You see, the decision has already been made - all she wants for you to do is to look, endorse, and be happy for her.
Imagine, your friend is as footloose and fancy-free as you are, but her choice of husband turns out to be a pretentious, heavy usa-accent, patronizing, chennai-hating, tam-bram tradition loving "boy". What...but what is one supposed to do? The man looks most horrified when I ask him "...so do you like cooking?". I mean, he has stayed outside India for more than a decade now, and even I with all my loathing, can cook to save my life, so its a logical conclusion that he knows how to cook. How can he claim to love tamil and yet say, "I comparrrtmentalize my life, speak tamil only at home!", in Chennai. Not like I was asking him to speak only Tamil in London right?
I hate people who begin a conversation with "I was promised scintillating conversation by her"...its a guaranteed method for a boring, groping for inoffensive topics conversation. It just puts unnecessary pressure on the parties.
The worst is yet to follow - you successfully negotiate the powder-keg evening, bite back all the amazingly witty responses that are your trademark, smile enough at the man to convince him he's a hit, avoid spending more than a second necessary, escape home, shut the door and heave huge sighs of relief....only to get an sms from the woman demanding feedback. I mean, what am I supposed to say? It took the longest 10 minutes of my life, to compose a message that was thoroughly cleansed of any bitchiness and true sarcasm. It had to say only the nicest things about a man I wouldn't touch with a bargepole - imagine the effort in the cause of true friendship! Phew! I atleast did hard labour, another friend was so hard put to respond, she didn't! Woes of the sisterhood, man!
Certain of these awkward situations are better than others. Case in point, meeting a friend's parents. These are genuinely nice people, who themselves have no clue about their son/daughter's "activities" outside home, and who think that their son's friend should be a "nice" girl. Hardly the place to respond to blameless people who ask you "...so your parents must be looking for a boy for you.." with a snarling "...how does it matter to you whether I marry or not...bugger off!". So I usually try to look demure, smile (more like grimace) and say "yeah...they keep asking...but there's time...".
Other situations are painful - meeting a friend's boy/girl friend (who you instantly dislike), meeting the parents at places they wouldn't expect you (e.g. coming out of sex shop/casino/sexy lingerie shop). But most painful of all...is meeting your best (girl)friend's fiancee - hubby-to-be. This is when, you can't give any feedback to friend, can't prevent the worst from happening, can't tell her..."woman! the man's not our type". You see, the decision has already been made - all she wants for you to do is to look, endorse, and be happy for her.
Imagine, your friend is as footloose and fancy-free as you are, but her choice of husband turns out to be a pretentious, heavy usa-accent, patronizing, chennai-hating, tam-bram tradition loving "boy". What...but what is one supposed to do? The man looks most horrified when I ask him "...so do you like cooking?". I mean, he has stayed outside India for more than a decade now, and even I with all my loathing, can cook to save my life, so its a logical conclusion that he knows how to cook. How can he claim to love tamil and yet say, "I comparrrtmentalize my life, speak tamil only at home!", in Chennai. Not like I was asking him to speak only Tamil in London right?
I hate people who begin a conversation with "I was promised scintillating conversation by her"...its a guaranteed method for a boring, groping for inoffensive topics conversation. It just puts unnecessary pressure on the parties.
The worst is yet to follow - you successfully negotiate the powder-keg evening, bite back all the amazingly witty responses that are your trademark, smile enough at the man to convince him he's a hit, avoid spending more than a second necessary, escape home, shut the door and heave huge sighs of relief....only to get an sms from the woman demanding feedback. I mean, what am I supposed to say? It took the longest 10 minutes of my life, to compose a message that was thoroughly cleansed of any bitchiness and true sarcasm. It had to say only the nicest things about a man I wouldn't touch with a bargepole - imagine the effort in the cause of true friendship! Phew! I atleast did hard labour, another friend was so hard put to respond, she didn't! Woes of the sisterhood, man!
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Traditional Families
I was watching this Tamil movie - "Yaaradi Nee Mohini" - which features what the filmmaker thinks is a traditional Iyengar family. The filmmaker's idea of orthodoxy struck me as silly, an immature attempt at slapstick, and definitely not funny. But this post is not about that. The story goes that this traditional family is the one forcing the heroine into a marriage she doesnt want. Not by brute force, but just the burden of expectations.
That set of a train of thought on how tradition and the families hidebound to it, shape the lives of women in India, and possibly elsewhere. I can't talk of other countries, or possibly even other cultures within India, so I'll stick to Iyengardom, as I know it.
Typical scenario, the family (nuclear also), and its immediate surroundings are seeped in "tradition". Tradition means celebrating every festival with ALL the rituals, no matter how impractical. Every religious occasion - new moon, full moon, crescents in between, month beginning, month end, saturday, tuesday, thursday and all days in between - are observed with appropriate piety. Men and women, supposedly have assigned roles and should stick to them, with..ahem...exceptions.
This is carried to the extreme and results in ridiculous situations! Like the time my aunt me I couldn't join a new job on a pre-set date - it was a Navami (god knows whats wrong with the number 9, other religions praise it!). I had to explain to her that the corporate world works just a tad differently and I better join if I wanted to have a job! Or the fact that my mom insists that dad and I get out of the house first, whenever the family goes out - threes are unlucky, see! I tell my mom she should have planned better - can't estrange herself from my father every 5 minutes to make up!
These things might sound harmless enough, but they are like ivy, creeping up on you slowly, choking the life out of you, slowly...very slowly. There are constant irritants that leave you longing to escape, leave you shaking your head in disbelief. See, its not all backward - thats the most incidious part of the situation. These families educate their women, send them to work even, but still they have to follow TRADITION, no matter how much it harms their lifestyle!
Its not done through coercion, its done through conditioning. For a long time, I beleived that having a period was "unclean"...something to be ashamed of! Biology classes didn't help - this was Madras and no one explained very clearly what was happening. I had to (and still do) sleep separately, on a plank (that has changed now, after some 15 years) with a rexin pillow. I was given water in a separate bottle and had to stick to one chair (only) for 3 days - these things continue even today! I couldn't go into the kitchen (that one I don't do anyways ;-))...I couldn't go near the gods for sure...I couldn't take the food plate from my mom's hands - had to pick it off the floor, no matter I had cramps that left me (and still do) crying out loud! Oh, by the way, I had to bear the pain of those cramps - tablets were considered harmful! Pain that left me confused, bewildered, wondering how my mom couldn't understand my suffering, pain I couldn't share with others - it made me feel guilty.
Enough of icky things, there are other "important" things you say? Let me tell you something - I hit puberty at 11, I am 29 now - that makes it 18 years now, 216 periods in all, 648 days or nearly 2 years of pain, humilaition and irritation. How would you take it? Do tell...and I'm not alone. I had classmates, friends all through who were meted out this treatment in varying degrees. Girls who were turning into women, with no idea what that meant...who were expected to study and perform as well as the boys, with none of the freedoms that the guys took for granted.
But, there are other things, even more dangerous. Marriage, most important of all. Again, drawing from experience, it took till age 18, when I reached college for me to question, accept and like the idea that "love" marriages are ok, they are not done by "bad" girls. This probably explains why I've lurched from one dysfunctional relationship to another since then - but I'll save that for another post.
Traditional families rear their girls on a staple of "Good girls listen to their parents". Good girls wait till after education, marry a groom chosen by their parents, have babies and "settle down" whatever that means! Good girls know that to look at men before marriage is "bad", to fall in "love" sacrilege, and to actually have a marriage for "love" unthinkable! Love was (and is) a four-letter foul word in these families. Marriages are "arranged" - horoscopes are matched, families are investigated, wealth and education are assessed. Likes and dislikes didn't matter - the girl is expected to "adjust", even today! Things have changed, even my friends claim! Oh yes, they have - "love" marriages are ok now, as long as the bride and groom are from the same community, earn similar amounts. Money makes up for a lot of shortcomings, you know.
This "progressive" outlook is what makes moms (all of them) I meet say, its ok, you girls (unmarried women like me), are free to choose your guy - just ensure they are Brahmin, Tamil, working in US/UK, earning a lot, are educated like you. Ha! I can look for a partner for life, just that he should be tailored to their requirements than mine. Some marriage that would be. The saddest thing about these traditional families, is they don't force you - there is no violence, no anger. Just the entire weight of a clan's expectations, that slowly, inexorably, crush you into submission. If you don't they just double their expectations, come at you more frequently, complacent in the knowledge that you will succumb at some point of time, its never failed to work before. Its almost a tradition!
That set of a train of thought on how tradition and the families hidebound to it, shape the lives of women in India, and possibly elsewhere. I can't talk of other countries, or possibly even other cultures within India, so I'll stick to Iyengardom, as I know it.
Typical scenario, the family (nuclear also), and its immediate surroundings are seeped in "tradition". Tradition means celebrating every festival with ALL the rituals, no matter how impractical. Every religious occasion - new moon, full moon, crescents in between, month beginning, month end, saturday, tuesday, thursday and all days in between - are observed with appropriate piety. Men and women, supposedly have assigned roles and should stick to them, with..ahem...exceptions.
This is carried to the extreme and results in ridiculous situations! Like the time my aunt me I couldn't join a new job on a pre-set date - it was a Navami (god knows whats wrong with the number 9, other religions praise it!). I had to explain to her that the corporate world works just a tad differently and I better join if I wanted to have a job! Or the fact that my mom insists that dad and I get out of the house first, whenever the family goes out - threes are unlucky, see! I tell my mom she should have planned better - can't estrange herself from my father every 5 minutes to make up!
These things might sound harmless enough, but they are like ivy, creeping up on you slowly, choking the life out of you, slowly...very slowly. There are constant irritants that leave you longing to escape, leave you shaking your head in disbelief. See, its not all backward - thats the most incidious part of the situation. These families educate their women, send them to work even, but still they have to follow TRADITION, no matter how much it harms their lifestyle!
Its not done through coercion, its done through conditioning. For a long time, I beleived that having a period was "unclean"...something to be ashamed of! Biology classes didn't help - this was Madras and no one explained very clearly what was happening. I had to (and still do) sleep separately, on a plank (that has changed now, after some 15 years) with a rexin pillow. I was given water in a separate bottle and had to stick to one chair (only) for 3 days - these things continue even today! I couldn't go into the kitchen (that one I don't do anyways ;-))...I couldn't go near the gods for sure...I couldn't take the food plate from my mom's hands - had to pick it off the floor, no matter I had cramps that left me (and still do) crying out loud! Oh, by the way, I had to bear the pain of those cramps - tablets were considered harmful! Pain that left me confused, bewildered, wondering how my mom couldn't understand my suffering, pain I couldn't share with others - it made me feel guilty.
Enough of icky things, there are other "important" things you say? Let me tell you something - I hit puberty at 11, I am 29 now - that makes it 18 years now, 216 periods in all, 648 days or nearly 2 years of pain, humilaition and irritation. How would you take it? Do tell...and I'm not alone. I had classmates, friends all through who were meted out this treatment in varying degrees. Girls who were turning into women, with no idea what that meant...who were expected to study and perform as well as the boys, with none of the freedoms that the guys took for granted.
But, there are other things, even more dangerous. Marriage, most important of all. Again, drawing from experience, it took till age 18, when I reached college for me to question, accept and like the idea that "love" marriages are ok, they are not done by "bad" girls. This probably explains why I've lurched from one dysfunctional relationship to another since then - but I'll save that for another post.
Traditional families rear their girls on a staple of "Good girls listen to their parents". Good girls wait till after education, marry a groom chosen by their parents, have babies and "settle down" whatever that means! Good girls know that to look at men before marriage is "bad", to fall in "love" sacrilege, and to actually have a marriage for "love" unthinkable! Love was (and is) a four-letter foul word in these families. Marriages are "arranged" - horoscopes are matched, families are investigated, wealth and education are assessed. Likes and dislikes didn't matter - the girl is expected to "adjust", even today! Things have changed, even my friends claim! Oh yes, they have - "love" marriages are ok now, as long as the bride and groom are from the same community, earn similar amounts. Money makes up for a lot of shortcomings, you know.
This "progressive" outlook is what makes moms (all of them) I meet say, its ok, you girls (unmarried women like me), are free to choose your guy - just ensure they are Brahmin, Tamil, working in US/UK, earning a lot, are educated like you. Ha! I can look for a partner for life, just that he should be tailored to their requirements than mine. Some marriage that would be. The saddest thing about these traditional families, is they don't force you - there is no violence, no anger. Just the entire weight of a clan's expectations, that slowly, inexorably, crush you into submission. If you don't they just double their expectations, come at you more frequently, complacent in the knowledge that you will succumb at some point of time, its never failed to work before. Its almost a tradition!
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Training Types
Looking around the table…
Yuppie Sales guy: He’s read all the relevant books, has prepared client briefs with exhaustive details including fetishes for smelly underwear, the aspirational guy who is the first to jump up and present, demo-ing that he’s listening…he’s all there, no matter he says all that he shouldn’t.
Blow-hard “I’m here to show my peers I’ve arrived” sales guy: Da man with all da answers. Been there, done that, can’t let go of the t-shirt. BSD is the memorable phenomenon that Michael Lewis i.d.-d. He can’t stop talking of how he handles clients oh-so-very differently, how he accesses the higher levels with panache. If only he stopped and listened hard, he’d hear the sound of no one caring a hoot. Such behaviour is usually the result of a mistaken assumption that your audience has no idea what you are about. These are the guys who talk continually of a sales guy’s life being terribly exciting (daily), no matter that half the time, you are chasing a squiggle on a purchase order that will save your ass for precisely 3 days (till next week’s review). I know what you are thinking…sounds…cynical. Right?
Of course it does! That brings me to the next type. The Cynic – this one’s close to my heart. It’s me! The kind who attends the training with a bored look, fighting sleep constantly, smirking @ the above two types, and of course updating a blog! For the world of me I don’t understand sitting in a hall hearing a very nice (I have to be honest) lady trying to explain solution selling. Its all very well, but when I want to talk strategy, my client wants me to find the missing parts! When I write to the CEO, saying I might have something relevant to him, he scrolls down, sees my designation, and presses Shift + Delete!
There is one last type that holds out hope for humanity. These are the Nice Guys – guys who are there knowing it is a waste of time, but are willing to give it a hearing; guys who are capable of giving their full attention to the goings-on and respect the idea behind the training. Nice guys these – they are even willing to take some learnings away from the jing-bang! More power to them, the nicest chaps on this beleaguered planet!
Yuppie Sales guy: He’s read all the relevant books, has prepared client briefs with exhaustive details including fetishes for smelly underwear, the aspirational guy who is the first to jump up and present, demo-ing that he’s listening…he’s all there, no matter he says all that he shouldn’t.
Blow-hard “I’m here to show my peers I’ve arrived” sales guy: Da man with all da answers. Been there, done that, can’t let go of the t-shirt. BSD is the memorable phenomenon that Michael Lewis i.d.-d. He can’t stop talking of how he handles clients oh-so-very differently, how he accesses the higher levels with panache. If only he stopped and listened hard, he’d hear the sound of no one caring a hoot. Such behaviour is usually the result of a mistaken assumption that your audience has no idea what you are about. These are the guys who talk continually of a sales guy’s life being terribly exciting (daily), no matter that half the time, you are chasing a squiggle on a purchase order that will save your ass for precisely 3 days (till next week’s review). I know what you are thinking…sounds…cynical. Right?
Of course it does! That brings me to the next type. The Cynic – this one’s close to my heart. It’s me! The kind who attends the training with a bored look, fighting sleep constantly, smirking @ the above two types, and of course updating a blog! For the world of me I don’t understand sitting in a hall hearing a very nice (I have to be honest) lady trying to explain solution selling. Its all very well, but when I want to talk strategy, my client wants me to find the missing parts! When I write to the CEO, saying I might have something relevant to him, he scrolls down, sees my designation, and presses Shift + Delete!
There is one last type that holds out hope for humanity. These are the Nice Guys – guys who are there knowing it is a waste of time, but are willing to give it a hearing; guys who are capable of giving their full attention to the goings-on and respect the idea behind the training. Nice guys these – they are even willing to take some learnings away from the jing-bang! More power to them, the nicest chaps on this beleaguered planet!
Monday, September 08, 2008
The city of 100 spires....
There ARE some perks to working in Sales...once a year, the powers that be decide that they have had enough laughs at the sales force's expense, no more torturing for orders that won't or can't come in anyways, no more demeaning waiting-in-client-reception-for-acting-pricey-client, no more ego-crushing, self-respect destroying exercises in order-picking. Its the end of the year, so go forth and recharge!
This usually means a jamboree in a distant land (for those in India at least), in a 30-hour nightmare flight in steerage, a time to reflect, retrospect and presumably rejuvenate. The smarter amongst us, combines a holiday, pre- or post- this meeting, company pays the long haul, see? A two-week break from clients appears tinted in pink and dressed in rose petals at the end of a grueling last month...so I scoured the net for possible locations at 1 hour flying distance from Frankfurt and finally decide - Praha!Prague - city of medieval mystery, golems, ghosts, knights in battered armour, castles, legends and magic!
Often, there are places that look glossy, attractive, and seeped in history, only for reality to be jarringly different and often disappointing. Prague, thankfully is not one of these. I did have to put up with great weather that seemed to have brought every holidaying family, ageing spinster in Western Europe, out in droves. The bright sunshine also meant that castles and churches instead of appearing gloomy and mysterious, appear beautiful and accessible. But still, it is amazingly pretty, fantistically preserved and very friendly.
Legends abound...the knight turned to stone by his virginal bride, who appears every year to claim a new one...the rabbi who made an image of himself in mud, for it to turn into the violent golem, of clashing faiths, reappearing priests and babies fighting off the Devil himself! There is an abundance of architectural styles - gothic, renaissance, modern, roman...all in amiable co-existence.
And churches....100s of them...scattered all over, with a cycle of faiths that have all imprinted themselves! The townhall tower, offers a magnificent view across the Old Town and every turn of the head, brings up a new spire, more ornate than before. Dominating the landscape is the castle's St. Vitus Cathedral - a Gothic structure with amazing murals and the tomb of every nobleman and royalty to have frequented the place. The more money you donated to the Church, the closer to the main altar you got buried and the more ornate your tomb - the meek shall inherit the earth!!
Prague Castle (from the outside at least) was a disappointment, looking like a bad 5* hotel - I don't understand why palaces can qualify to be castles and hills become mountains in Europe! Prague retains traces of its Communist recent-past and people still seem to be sorting out details including rent-control and free education. 1968 when the Russians rolled in their tanks, is fresh in their memory, and the smart youngsters of today mill around old women dressed in black lace, carrying groceries like treasure.
The city is amazing by night and the Prague of medieval times seems to play hide-and-seek in low light. If you strain your ears, you can almost hear the clip-clops of horse-drawn carraiges and imagine the night watchman patrolling the streets in a black cape and lantern. You blink, only to realise the carriages are real with scores of tourists and the black figure is a student by day and guide by night! Such is life...in Prague where dream and reality seem to meld...where you can straddle centuries in a day and relax with light Czech beer by night!
Friday, July 18, 2008
Comic Book Heroes: Paper to Pixel!
The world at large and the movie-world in particular are quivering with excitement at The Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan's "dark, brooding, mysterious" tale - 5th Batman movie, 2nd in its new avatar. The worldwide takings on the opening weekend are expected to be the biggest Hollywood has ever seen, bigger than current leader - Spiderman III!
Which brings me to - do superheroes leap from books to cinema, just as easily as they jump buildings, lift cars and rescue people? What guarantees everlasting silver-stardom to a few? Is it dependent on the movie or the character? Director or creator?
In an America threatened by new forces - political, revolutionary and economic - superheroes seem to be just what the paranoid public wants to cling to. Susan Faludi, writes about DC comics came up with a whole slew of superhero stories after 9/11 - white knights endorsing firefighters, rescuing women from burning towers, and make heroes of ordinary people.
After all, wouldn't anyone want to be superhero? Imagine wearing a cape, using cool gadgets, getting your (most times) woman and flying through the air (wearing tights is a minor price to pay for all this)...that rocks! The most delicious part is that we all have to suspend disbelief and accept that Clark Kent, Bruce Wayne, Peter Parker et al are just regular guys, when they step out of their pantsuits. Ok...Bruce Wayne...is filthy rich, but hey! cut the guy some slack - he's an orphan. The step from hero to super hero is just as easy as shrugging out of a shirt - isn't that a delicious thought.
But the transition from paper to movie is not so smooth. Agreed, comic books are easy for studio execs to understand, relate to - being storyboards themselves. But, comics leave much to our imagination while detailing much else that cinema cannot aspire to. There are extremes of facial expression that real human beings (non Jim Carrey) cannot match. Cinema demands continuous delineation of a story, comic books can make a transition from act1 to act2 with a few lines of text! The same "strong, silent" hero of the comic turns into a "taciturn, boring, inarticulate" hero of the movie - hardly endearing. Sometimes, the sheer weight of buries the franchise - Superman 1 & 2 rode on Christopher Reeves, but geeky charm can only do so much to prop a poor script.
The women fare even worse, the only kinds of women that seem to catch the public's imagination are house-trained witches who twitch their noses and ensure their hubby's success - why am I surprised.
In recent times there seems to have been a re-boot for many all-but-dead franchises, thanks to fantastic special effects, some tight scripts, extensive publicity and a hugely interested, younger audience in emerging markets.
Superman returning has had a mixed response with many probably viewing him as anachronistic - we all love to see our angst in our heroes. The undoubted success has been Spidey, captivating old and young with an endearingly geeky Tobey Macguire, appropriately contrite James Franco and enough special effects to annexe the next planet! But methinks they have outlasted their streak - Spidey 3 felt like Peter Parker 3* and there is no Tobey in the next one though the studios are threatening us with atleast 2 more!!!
Batman, the old favourite, who never quite seems to have gone away, is back, and as a hero quite close to the original comic and closer to evil than ever before. A posthumous Oscar for a painted face in a film with a hero dressed in tights - who knows? More power to Christopher Nolan!!!
Which brings me to - do superheroes leap from books to cinema, just as easily as they jump buildings, lift cars and rescue people? What guarantees everlasting silver-stardom to a few? Is it dependent on the movie or the character? Director or creator?
In an America threatened by new forces - political, revolutionary and economic - superheroes seem to be just what the paranoid public wants to cling to. Susan Faludi, writes about DC comics came up with a whole slew of superhero stories after 9/11 - white knights endorsing firefighters, rescuing women from burning towers, and make heroes of ordinary people.
After all, wouldn't anyone want to be superhero? Imagine wearing a cape, using cool gadgets, getting your (most times) woman and flying through the air (wearing tights is a minor price to pay for all this)...that rocks! The most delicious part is that we all have to suspend disbelief and accept that Clark Kent, Bruce Wayne, Peter Parker et al are just regular guys, when they step out of their pantsuits. Ok...Bruce Wayne...is filthy rich, but hey! cut the guy some slack - he's an orphan. The step from hero to super hero is just as easy as shrugging out of a shirt - isn't that a delicious thought.
But the transition from paper to movie is not so smooth. Agreed, comic books are easy for studio execs to understand, relate to - being storyboards themselves. But, comics leave much to our imagination while detailing much else that cinema cannot aspire to. There are extremes of facial expression that real human beings (non Jim Carrey) cannot match. Cinema demands continuous delineation of a story, comic books can make a transition from act1 to act2 with a few lines of text! The same "strong, silent" hero of the comic turns into a "taciturn, boring, inarticulate" hero of the movie - hardly endearing. Sometimes, the sheer weight of buries the franchise - Superman 1 & 2 rode on Christopher Reeves, but geeky charm can only do so much to prop a poor script.
The women fare even worse, the only kinds of women that seem to catch the public's imagination are house-trained witches who twitch their noses and ensure their hubby's success - why am I surprised.
In recent times there seems to have been a re-boot for many all-but-dead franchises, thanks to fantastic special effects, some tight scripts, extensive publicity and a hugely interested, younger audience in emerging markets.
Superman returning has had a mixed response with many probably viewing him as anachronistic - we all love to see our angst in our heroes. The undoubted success has been Spidey, captivating old and young with an endearingly geeky Tobey Macguire, appropriately contrite James Franco and enough special effects to annexe the next planet! But methinks they have outlasted their streak - Spidey 3 felt like Peter Parker 3* and there is no Tobey in the next one though the studios are threatening us with atleast 2 more!!!
Batman, the old favourite, who never quite seems to have gone away, is back, and as a hero quite close to the original comic and closer to evil than ever before. A posthumous Oscar for a painted face in a film with a hero dressed in tights - who knows? More power to Christopher Nolan!!!
Friday, June 20, 2008
Well-Intentioned...
I am not too sure of what this means - well-intentioned - because it usually manifests itself as "...in spite of well-meaning efforts..." or "well-intentioned efforts misfired...". Makes me wonder...are the actions mitigated just because the underlying effort was well-meant? Am not sure...
Often the best-laid plans go awry, because of certain actions - well-intentioned in most cases. I guess the most misanthropic of us cannot escape humanity's "social" evils.
We run and run, trying to get away from the billions on this planet, reducing our sphere of exertion/influence, restricting our interactions, staying out of others' way...but no...can't escape the teeming masses. Ok...fine...i'll talk to them masses...but where I have to...for the absolute essentials...NOT when its foisted on me...by....i knew you'd guess it... Well-Intentioned Efforts!!!
Often the best-laid plans go awry, because of certain actions - well-intentioned in most cases. I guess the most misanthropic of us cannot escape humanity's "social" evils.
We run and run, trying to get away from the billions on this planet, reducing our sphere of exertion/influence, restricting our interactions, staying out of others' way...but no...can't escape the teeming masses. Ok...fine...i'll talk to them masses...but where I have to...for the absolute essentials...NOT when its foisted on me...by....i knew you'd guess it... Well-Intentioned Efforts!!!
Monday, March 17, 2008
It doesn't work for me...period!!
A week after its release, I watched Jodhaa Akbar. I had already read most of the reviews, had heard the CD umpteen number of times and was pretty impressed with the teaser pictures shown ahead of the release. Hrithink and Aishwarya looked like a million bucks and it was an Ashutosh Gowariker picture, he of the Lagaan and Oscar fame.
Maybe it was the weight of expectation, but the film hardly lived up to the hype. The lead actors made a fine pair, very pleasant on the eyes and they do seem to have made an effort. But thats about all that works for the film. The screenplay appeared rushed, just a narrative rather than a perspective of Akbar's life. Akbar is whiter than the whitest and Jodhaa can't quite seem to decide which century she belongs in 15th or 21st!
Therein lies one problem, as I see it, with Jodhaa Akbar.Most period films (historical, mythological, war etc etc), have a basic tenet - transport the viewer back in time. This is a peculiar problem to deal with simply 'cos the sky was blue then, it is blue now. So how does the film maker or for that matter the film goer visualize the times gone by?
Of course, the movie makers have to recreate that particular time in history or "period" for us - this is done by putting up the same kind of costumes, recreating the hairstyles, the surroundings, the machines (or the lack of them). But, I suspect it has more to do with our perception of the past.
The visual medium associated with that age would colour my imagination of that age.
E.g:
Recent past (say 200 years or so) - sepia/black and white. Landscape - golden brown, the pace slower (so we assume), the people more innocent (we are sentimentalists!).
Europe in the middle ages - dark, gloomy,purple of the soutane, the renaissance paintings
Indian myth - sculptures from temples, descriptions of jewellery of the gods, ravi varma paintings (human-like gods)
This is a tough proposition for filmmakers, but one they have managed to overcome to varying degrees. Films use certain tones to depict a time in history and the entire production design is oriented towards this tone. Consistency is of importance and at no time or place can this be compromised. So the outdoors and the indoors have to reflect history, the mood of the movie and have to age accordingly. Advances in CGI have definitely helped and so have filters and processing techniques. I have no idea of what these techniques are and how they work, but when I sit in a darkened movie hall, I do want to get swept away, dress up in fancy costumes, fly with the gods, scheme with courtiers, dance at balls, and generally have a good time!
These movies worked for me...I guess there's lots more that can be added:No particular order
Maybe it was the weight of expectation, but the film hardly lived up to the hype. The lead actors made a fine pair, very pleasant on the eyes and they do seem to have made an effort. But thats about all that works for the film. The screenplay appeared rushed, just a narrative rather than a perspective of Akbar's life. Akbar is whiter than the whitest and Jodhaa can't quite seem to decide which century she belongs in 15th or 21st!
Therein lies one problem, as I see it, with Jodhaa Akbar.Most period films (historical, mythological, war etc etc), have a basic tenet - transport the viewer back in time. This is a peculiar problem to deal with simply 'cos the sky was blue then, it is blue now. So how does the film maker or for that matter the film goer visualize the times gone by?
Of course, the movie makers have to recreate that particular time in history or "period" for us - this is done by putting up the same kind of costumes, recreating the hairstyles, the surroundings, the machines (or the lack of them). But, I suspect it has more to do with our perception of the past.
The visual medium associated with that age would colour my imagination of that age.
E.g:
Recent past (say 200 years or so) - sepia/black and white. Landscape - golden brown, the pace slower (so we assume), the people more innocent (we are sentimentalists!).
Europe in the middle ages - dark, gloomy,purple of the soutane, the renaissance paintings
Indian myth - sculptures from temples, descriptions of jewellery of the gods, ravi varma paintings (human-like gods)
This is a tough proposition for filmmakers, but one they have managed to overcome to varying degrees. Films use certain tones to depict a time in history and the entire production design is oriented towards this tone. Consistency is of importance and at no time or place can this be compromised. So the outdoors and the indoors have to reflect history, the mood of the movie and have to age accordingly. Advances in CGI have definitely helped and so have filters and processing techniques. I have no idea of what these techniques are and how they work, but when I sit in a darkened movie hall, I do want to get swept away, dress up in fancy costumes, fly with the gods, scheme with courtiers, dance at balls, and generally have a good time!
These movies worked for me...I guess there's lots more that can be added:No particular order
- Lord of the Rings - New Zealand, magical in itself, was burnished in gold, the Shire was bathed in fairytale green. Mordor was a frightening CGI creation of rumbling grey, scary black. Gondor was a spectacular white fortress in the mountains. Hobbits were plump, cheery and small, the Elves - ethereal, translucent, Lothlorien - timeless. Wizards were larger than life, orcs - hideous, ents - old, nazgul - not so scary, and the ring - alive. In short - almost as Tolkien wrote it and I imagined it!
- Schindler's list - Filmed in B&W, the cruelties of the war are presented as such, without emphasis, which in itself is frightening. Shot documentary style, the lighting and sets are stark, much like the photos of the Holocaust that serve as evidence of the horror. Handheld camera helped to emphasize the rawness and gave the movie an edge
- The English Patient - Sweeping vistas of the desert, glorious costumes from the tailor of the royals, light and shadow-play that gives flashbacks the softness of memories, the beauty of war-torn Italy - the scene in the church with its murals is splendid. The book on which it is based, had an epic sweep - set almost at the end of WW2, it moves across continents and exotic cultures with ease. The sets are fantastic and take us back to a happier time where boundaries didn't exist and the madness of war hadn't whittled everything down to a strife-torn minimum.
- Elizabeth - Shekar Kapur brought an Indian sensibility to the tale of the "Virgin" queen. Lofty overhead shots, dark, brooding sets punctuated by flashes of red, fiery oranges create a movie that exudes the power of its protagonist. Tudor history was presented without its cliches and the designs created a lush, courtroom spectacle where anarchy and chaos lurk around the corner and can even be glimpsed out of the corner of the eye.
- Lagaan - Painstakingly recreating an entire village set in a hazy time of pre-Independence India is no easy task, given the limitations in budget and technology that India usually faces. Lagaan's filmmakers setup a village in Bhuj and Bhanu Athaiya recreated the costumes of pre-independence India and sourced antique and musical instruments from around the country. The Kutch desert serves well as a drought stricken village and the dialect displaces it to somewhere in UP
- Guru - Biopics even if they claim not to be so, are a tough proposition. More so, when the lifetime in question coincides with a time of huge change in the surroundings. Guru, inspired by Dhirubai Ambani's life was as much a story of India post-1947, as of the man. The film moves from the sepia-laced 1950s to the bell-bottomed 1970s, to the cooler tones of the recent past, seamlessly. The costumes and hairstyles keep pace with the times. Particularly interesting is the recreation of the Mumbai sea-front of the 1950s. Props change too - from the tram of the 1950s to the long "imported" cars and Ambassadors of the pre-liberalization India.
- All the mythologicals of the 1960s in Tamil cinema (mostly A.P.Nagarajan) - I know...this is oh, so inappropriate! But then, these movies with their cardboard sets, gilt-laden jewellery/walls/swords, actors weighed down by kgs of make-up, were all that people in a country where legend is part of life, imagined divinity to be. They featured amongst other things, some of the best music of all time in Tamil cinema, recreated the grandeur of the heavens (as evidenced by our temples), in an age where the most challenging special effect was to show a man landing a punch on another.
- More of the list - I am too tired to write descriptions!
- Vanity Fair (Mira Nair version)
- 1947 -Earth, Water (especially the blue tones)
- Marie Antoinette
- Spartacus
- Gandhi
- Saving Private Ryan
- Pride and Prejudice (TV Series, since it features Colin Firth
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Home...
Where do I go? Stuck in an unhappy marriage with here, self-imposed exile from there and perched on the edges of a wretched equilibrium between the two.
Waiting for something to happen, to disturb this state of affairs...its that elusive jolt, that seems to happen to others without any deliberate action! Why am I being denied this small peace of living in the city I love above all others!!!!!
Waiting for something to happen, to disturb this state of affairs...its that elusive jolt, that seems to happen to others without any deliberate action! Why am I being denied this small peace of living in the city I love above all others!!!!!
Thursday, March 06, 2008
Days...books...women!
March 8th is Women's Day! Being a Saturday, the world at large has decided to celebrate and mark the occasion a day earlier :-). My office has caught the mood too and we are having a celebration! Games, fun and frolic for the women it seems! I have a bunch of flowers on my desk and a poster wishing me. A few of my male colleagues wandered up to wish me and there was much mirth and giggling when some of the flowers and posters were transplanted to other "male" colleagues' desks (presumably to embarrass them).
Makes me wonder - what do I think of this day? Should I gush about being remembered along with books, lovers, fathers, mothers, pets, wearing odd socks, dances, talking like a pirate and sundry things? Or should I wrinkle my nose at it and say "...I hate there being just one day for women!..."? Truth to tell, I don't know. It does seem strange that half the world's population has been singled out for an international day! Like...nobody knew these women were around till the UN decided to call it a day (sorry...couldn't help it!)? Add to it, how is it marked? People send flowers, there are movies on tv, RJs call guys and ask them what they are gifting their wives/girlfriends for Women's Day! Its all considerably silly and incredibly shallow!
I included the "books" in the title 'cos of an article in the guardian about World Books Day - but it turns out that WBD is March 6th only for the world according to the British and the Irish. For the rest of us outside of the Empire, it is April 23rd. Being very lazy, I shall on the 23rd post one titled "Refer 8th March"! So long...
Makes me wonder - what do I think of this day? Should I gush about being remembered along with books, lovers, fathers, mothers, pets, wearing odd socks, dances, talking like a pirate and sundry things? Or should I wrinkle my nose at it and say "...I hate there being just one day for women!..."? Truth to tell, I don't know. It does seem strange that half the world's population has been singled out for an international day! Like...nobody knew these women were around till the UN decided to call it a day (sorry...couldn't help it!)? Add to it, how is it marked? People send flowers, there are movies on tv, RJs call guys and ask them what they are gifting their wives/girlfriends for Women's Day! Its all considerably silly and incredibly shallow!
I included the "books" in the title 'cos of an article in the guardian about World Books Day - but it turns out that WBD is March 6th only for the world according to the British and the Irish. For the rest of us outside of the Empire, it is April 23rd. Being very lazy, I shall on the 23rd post one titled "Refer 8th March"! So long...
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Love, Hate and sundry matters!
Is it too much to ask for some effort/understanding/sensitivity? I don't know who's at fault here...I just want people to look beyond the prickly obvious and understand the fear behind it. The fear of being hurt, betrayed, used...its overwhelming..especially in the face of uncertainty. Why shouldn't I question the intent at this stage- isn't it the obvious conclusion to make when making any effort appears so difficult for the other party? Across a distance, what else is the comfort or reassurance one draws other than the obvious gestures?
Don't they realize that the only way to protect myself is to be matter-of-fact and not let the turmoil and attachment escape and give me away? To let my emotions pour out would be giving them too much control on me - it would be apparent just how far gone I am, and the dependence would become too obvious...the other person would get to know of it and use it to their benefit...not a good situation, especially when there is a possibility that the other person could very soon come and tell you "...i don't think this is working...long distance...am seeing another person.." meaning "crumple and dump!".
What do i expect - i don't know. Am naturally distrustful of the situation, so nothing other than the extremely obviously romantic gestures will do - romantic being defined my way...not the conventional. Would I do something like this? Oh yes! I'd do a lot of these things - however difficult it might be to implement them. Not doing it in the name of practicality, seems like taking the easy way out. Even if it means taking the early morning, late night flights to be with that person, I'd do that...even it it meant manipulating meetings to suit this schedule, I'd do that...even if it meant taking calls from the boss in less than ideal circumstances, I'd do that. But, alas, thats me! Why can't somebody do these things for me?!!! :-(
Don't they realize that the only way to protect myself is to be matter-of-fact and not let the turmoil and attachment escape and give me away? To let my emotions pour out would be giving them too much control on me - it would be apparent just how far gone I am, and the dependence would become too obvious...the other person would get to know of it and use it to their benefit...not a good situation, especially when there is a possibility that the other person could very soon come and tell you "...i don't think this is working...long distance...am seeing another person.." meaning "crumple and dump!".
What do i expect - i don't know. Am naturally distrustful of the situation, so nothing other than the extremely obviously romantic gestures will do - romantic being defined my way...not the conventional. Would I do something like this? Oh yes! I'd do a lot of these things - however difficult it might be to implement them. Not doing it in the name of practicality, seems like taking the easy way out. Even if it means taking the early morning, late night flights to be with that person, I'd do that...even it it meant manipulating meetings to suit this schedule, I'd do that...even if it meant taking calls from the boss in less than ideal circumstances, I'd do that. But, alas, thats me! Why can't somebody do these things for me?!!! :-(
Monday, February 18, 2008
Of the (Wo)men's movement!!!
The men it seems have decided to claim the women's movement for their own! The Hindu on Sunday, carried an article on the need for men in the women's movement. Now, this is not about progressive men including themselves in women's groups and feminist movements. This is about addressing men as a target audience for the feminist ideology.
Personally, I am ambivalent about the premise of the article. It states that there needs to be a specific, and concerted effort at including men in order to empower women. This is not a need to include men in women's groups - it is more an effort to educate men separately, convert more men to the empowerment ideology,so that there is "true gender equity".
While I agree that gender inequities cannot be addressed in isolation, it seems to me that its too presumptuous to cast men as "victims of patriarchy, as much as the women".I would be willing to be victimized indeed if it let me make the choices denied to half the planet, and let me abuse, subjugate and at the very least lead a better quality of life than half the human population.
The women's movement's first priority has to be women - men can come help, support and emancipate, but alongside us, not expecting to be treated any different, not expecting to be singled out for praise. Every human being, man or woman, who believes in equality and stakes their life on this belief, deserves thanks from the women's movement.
Every 7 minutes, a woman is raped in India - who's the victim here?! Its rather tough to go on about educating young boys and men on sex, gender and the need to treat a fellow human being with dignity, when you are in danger of being gang raped and worse! Education has done nothing to improve the behavior of men or the safety of women - every day the number of women who are in abusive marriages, without security, with children, with AIDS increases. And this is just the ones who have chosen to speak, out of desperation.
Believe me, I would love to have the boys of today, reared to be responsible men of tomorrow, but I would rather ensure enough girls get a chance to be born, reared and survive, till then. For the world would be drab, dreary, monotonous and lacking perspective without the woman to light it up.
Personally, I am ambivalent about the premise of the article. It states that there needs to be a specific, and concerted effort at including men in order to empower women. This is not a need to include men in women's groups - it is more an effort to educate men separately, convert more men to the empowerment ideology,so that there is "true gender equity".
While I agree that gender inequities cannot be addressed in isolation, it seems to me that its too presumptuous to cast men as "victims of patriarchy, as much as the women".I would be willing to be victimized indeed if it let me make the choices denied to half the planet, and let me abuse, subjugate and at the very least lead a better quality of life than half the human population.
The women's movement's first priority has to be women - men can come help, support and emancipate, but alongside us, not expecting to be treated any different, not expecting to be singled out for praise. Every human being, man or woman, who believes in equality and stakes their life on this belief, deserves thanks from the women's movement.
Every 7 minutes, a woman is raped in India - who's the victim here?! Its rather tough to go on about educating young boys and men on sex, gender and the need to treat a fellow human being with dignity, when you are in danger of being gang raped and worse! Education has done nothing to improve the behavior of men or the safety of women - every day the number of women who are in abusive marriages, without security, with children, with AIDS increases. And this is just the ones who have chosen to speak, out of desperation.
Believe me, I would love to have the boys of today, reared to be responsible men of tomorrow, but I would rather ensure enough girls get a chance to be born, reared and survive, till then. For the world would be drab, dreary, monotonous and lacking perspective without the woman to light it up.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Of Weddings and Babies!!!
'Tis a New Year!!! Like everybody else, I have a New Year tradition (extendable to birthdays, anniversaries and similar such unmemorable occurences in life) - switch off phone at 10 PM, stay home, watch movie, go to bed before 12 at all costs. To me, its a waste of time, since Jan 1st brings with it no earth shaking change in mind, body or soul that Jan 1st - Dec 31st of previous year already hasn't. I am only a year older (ok..ok..in 8 weeks!), none the wiser, fatter, grayer, more cynical ( i know! that ain't possible). In short, not better!
I digress. To come back to this post - which is a result of much angst and bitching. I am 28 (there...I have gone ahead and done it). Seems to me that at this age, the rest of the world has only two tasks, which they tirelessly seek to fulfill - getting hitched, making babies (ugh! the phrase, not the kids). Its almost like there is a time-delay explosive in each human mind, that sets itself off in the mid-late twenties and drones on, ceaselessly, till obeyed - "Go Forth and Procreate". What is appalling and particularly hard to comprehend is that this entire exercise is one that happens voluntarily - human beings want to be defined only by their we(l)dded or otherwise status.
Consider the following scenarios - I had a chance to meet up with a friend after nearly five years and what do we discuss? Not careers, not money, not parents, not friends! We did discuss friends, but in following manner: "You remember Wonie, she's in Seattle, married to Wonky. They have a daughter!. You know Xany, who was going to marry Sammy, she married Pony instead!". Er, what are Wonie and Xany doing? "Oh, they are working in technology!". Yeah, right!
Or, consider this - I bump into a junior from college and her husband (who else!), and find that I barely remember her (she didn't either). We finally correlate names and faces, and I list a few others I remember, only to be told "Oh her, she's married...that girl, she's getting married this week...this person, is expecting a baby". DUH!!!!
STOP!! What? People don't have vocations anymore, passionate causes?! Ok, forget those (I don't either :-D), don't people have careers anymore?! What gets my goat is, this malady particularly afflicts womankind. A friend obsesses about how she's trying to fit babies into a career progression schedule in a manner most frightening. Another thinks that a woman in the management team at her workplace is not a shining example of women career-makers, because "she's not even ma.." ...rried. Of course, how could they, the " Much married-lost individual traits-have become my spouse's twin Club" would hardly countenance someone who presumably chose mind over menopause, when it came to making decisions in life.
Don't get me wrong, companionship, love..the works, all of it is fine. But, why does it snuff out what little individuality (its very less to begin with, especially with Indian brain-conditioned-to-confirm women), we retain? Why do women, who once wouldn't think twice about bonking a guy on his head for sexism, now spout a politically correct variant of the same excrement! Or are these just rantings in my head, because I'm on my way to becoming a lonely, sad, bitter old biddy, who is going to glare at women from under bushy eyebrows, and excessive chin hair jutting out, declare, "who needs kids, man, I have my dogs"?!!! I have no idea...for all you know, my next post (given usual frequency), might be a bouncy baby, titled "My Cho-Chweet Choby"!!!! ;-)I digress. To come back to this post - which is a result of much angst and bitching. I am 28 (there...I have gone ahead and done it). Seems to me that at this age, the rest of the world has only two tasks, which they tirelessly seek to fulfill - getting hitched, making babies (ugh! the phrase, not the kids). Its almost like there is a time-delay explosive in each human mind, that sets itself off in the mid-late twenties and drones on, ceaselessly, till obeyed - "Go Forth and Procreate". What is appalling and particularly hard to comprehend is that this entire exercise is one that happens voluntarily - human beings want to be defined only by their we(l)dded or otherwise status.
Consider the following scenarios - I had a chance to meet up with a friend after nearly five years and what do we discuss? Not careers, not money, not parents, not friends! We did discuss friends, but in following manner: "You remember Wonie, she's in Seattle, married to Wonky. They have a daughter!. You know Xany, who was going to marry Sammy, she married Pony instead!". Er, what are Wonie and Xany doing? "Oh, they are working in technology!". Yeah, right!
Or, consider this - I bump into a junior from college and her husband (who else!), and find that I barely remember her (she didn't either). We finally correlate names and faces, and I list a few others I remember, only to be told "Oh her, she's married...that girl, she's getting married this week...this person, is expecting a baby". DUH!!!!
STOP!! What? People don't have vocations anymore, passionate causes?! Ok, forget those (I don't either :-D), don't people have careers anymore?! What gets my goat is, this malady particularly afflicts womankind. A friend obsesses about how she's trying to fit babies into a career progression schedule in a manner most frightening. Another thinks that a woman in the management team at her workplace is not a shining example of women career-makers, because "she's not even ma.." ...rried. Of course, how could they, the " Much married-lost individual traits-have become my spouse's twin Club" would hardly countenance someone who presumably chose mind over menopause, when it came to making decisions in life.
Bittersweet Symphony!
Every once in a while, comes a time, when I get tired of being myself, in the circumstances I find myself in...mostly professional, sometimes personal. Many times, there is not much one can do about this - a makeover, wardrobe change, holiday - they all lift the gloom, streaks of silver in a pilling black. You tend to keep feeling the walls around you, looking for ways out of this puzzle. Then you are offered a choice - tempting, tantalizing, asking you to reach out and grab it. You hesitate, shrink back, remember things past, determined to do the right thing this time at least and save yourself. Thoughts of "what could be" are banished and you war with yourself, body and soul.
One day, things are at their lowest ebb, you review your choices (numbering one), throw caution to the winds, and plunge headlong into temptation. You frolic, drink deep, come back for more, and it is the loveliest time of your life. A sense of foreboding lurks around you, causing glitches, mood swings, tears and much heartache, but you fend it off, determined to live in the present. Till...
...there comes yet another moment, seemingly well orchestrated, that uproots you, from all that is familiar into a cloud of promise, betterment and riches. Its a bittersweet moment of professional triumph marred only by a sinking realization that you have had an all too brief attempt at an indescribable emotion. Yet more choices, you think, only to see that there are none. The Fates have decided for you, it couldn't have been better timed, an easy escape, a mutual release. There should be no hurt egos, broken hearts, there. Or will there be? You have kept reaffirming to yourself that the end is nigh, only to find yourself there, without having begun at all...
One day, things are at their lowest ebb, you review your choices (numbering one), throw caution to the winds, and plunge headlong into temptation. You frolic, drink deep, come back for more, and it is the loveliest time of your life. A sense of foreboding lurks around you, causing glitches, mood swings, tears and much heartache, but you fend it off, determined to live in the present. Till...
...there comes yet another moment, seemingly well orchestrated, that uproots you, from all that is familiar into a cloud of promise, betterment and riches. Its a bittersweet moment of professional triumph marred only by a sinking realization that you have had an all too brief attempt at an indescribable emotion. Yet more choices, you think, only to see that there are none. The Fates have decided for you, it couldn't have been better timed, an easy escape, a mutual release. There should be no hurt egos, broken hearts, there. Or will there be? You have kept reaffirming to yourself that the end is nigh, only to find yourself there, without having begun at all...
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Men and Measurements
What is with men and measurements - distances, curvatures, heights (oh yes! most definitely heights)? They seem to have an obsession with quantifying things - what I can measure, I have the measure of. The Freudian sub-text is rather hard to escape - :-).
I have read 2 books in the last month, both on men trying to measure the previously immeasurable. Well written, both are epic-movie-worthy sagas.
The Great Arc of the Indian Meridian: To call an exercise in traversing a 2400km long path - dotted with hills, plains, rivers; through forest, flood, fever; evading the clutches of thugs, thieves; placating the religious feathers of the "natives"- a mere survey, would never do it justice. This was the Great Trigonometrical Survey - 50 years, 1000s of men, millions of pounds.
Two men, pursued the survey with fanatical obsession, devoting their entire lives to the cause. William Lambton, lies in an obscure grave somewhere in Madhya Pradesh, long forgotten in Britain and India. His exacting standards of accuracy (3.5 inches over 400km!) were something the Survey's later proponents would never waver from.
George Everest was caustic, insensitive and abusive of colleagues and most definitely did not set sights ever on the mountain that now makes his, a household name.
The book, by John Keay, is a fast-paced read, capturing the sweep of the entire sub-continent and its flavors.Keay spends very little time explaining the basics of surveying before moving onto the men, their characters and their tribulations. The book takes us across a country so captivating and diverse that the only way to measure it was to stay indifferent. It is a slim, dramatic and fast-paced volume touching upon history, politics and the passion that drives scientific research.
Measuring the World by Daniel Kehlmann has been a best seller in multiple languages selling more than a million copies since publication. Kehlmann takes two historical figures - Baron von Humboldt, explorer, naturalist, aristocrat and Gauss, mathematician, scientist, commoner - and fashions a witty, ironic, magnificent novel of politics, revolution, science and personalities.
The book starts with Humboldt and Gauss meeting, at their dotage, in Berlin on the sidelines of the German Scientific Congress. From there, it travels back in time, chapter after clever chapter, charting the parallel course of their live, only for these lines to meet, as Gauss found they always do, in the end.
The central theme is displacement - Humboldt measured the world in absolute, traversing across Central and South America, measuring every peak, every river crossing, the line of the equator with precision. Gauss on the other hand, hardly stirred out of his hometown of Gottigen (he found his job as a surveyor a painful distraction) and imagined space as "folded, bent and very strange".
The personalities of these men are contradictory as well; Humboldt the aristocrat was tolerant and given to forgiven the transgressions of fellow humans, Gauss -arrogant and given to sadistic jibes at others. Humboldt's preference for boys is hardly evident, while Gauss is debauched, sowing his seeds at random, as long as they don't interfere with his research.
Painting their lives in the background of Napoleanic wars and upheavals across Europe, gives Kehlmann a chance to contemporize - the futility of war was plainly evident then as now. Unlike most post-war German fiction, Measuring the World is witty, sending itself up on more than one occasion (novels -"the perfect way to capture the most fleeting essence of the present for the future"). The ending is deliciously ironic (in light of recent events) with Eugen (Gauss's son and butt of his cruelest jibes) rebelling against his father and sailing to the icon of a liberal world - the US!
Craftily written, well translated, Kehlmann's book is loaded with asides and observations that remain with us long after its two lead-men and their obsession with measurement has been given a rest.
I have read 2 books in the last month, both on men trying to measure the previously immeasurable. Well written, both are epic-movie-worthy sagas.
The Great Arc of the Indian Meridian: To call an exercise in traversing a 2400km long path - dotted with hills, plains, rivers; through forest, flood, fever; evading the clutches of thugs, thieves; placating the religious feathers of the "natives"- a mere survey, would never do it justice. This was the Great Trigonometrical Survey - 50 years, 1000s of men, millions of pounds.
Two men, pursued the survey with fanatical obsession, devoting their entire lives to the cause. William Lambton, lies in an obscure grave somewhere in Madhya Pradesh, long forgotten in Britain and India. His exacting standards of accuracy (3.5 inches over 400km!) were something the Survey's later proponents would never waver from.
George Everest was caustic, insensitive and abusive of colleagues and most definitely did not set sights ever on the mountain that now makes his, a household name.
The book, by John Keay, is a fast-paced read, capturing the sweep of the entire sub-continent and its flavors.Keay spends very little time explaining the basics of surveying before moving onto the men, their characters and their tribulations. The book takes us across a country so captivating and diverse that the only way to measure it was to stay indifferent. It is a slim, dramatic and fast-paced volume touching upon history, politics and the passion that drives scientific research.
Measuring the World by Daniel Kehlmann has been a best seller in multiple languages selling more than a million copies since publication. Kehlmann takes two historical figures - Baron von Humboldt, explorer, naturalist, aristocrat and Gauss, mathematician, scientist, commoner - and fashions a witty, ironic, magnificent novel of politics, revolution, science and personalities.
The book starts with Humboldt and Gauss meeting, at their dotage, in Berlin on the sidelines of the German Scientific Congress. From there, it travels back in time, chapter after clever chapter, charting the parallel course of their live, only for these lines to meet, as Gauss found they always do, in the end.
The central theme is displacement - Humboldt measured the world in absolute, traversing across Central and South America, measuring every peak, every river crossing, the line of the equator with precision. Gauss on the other hand, hardly stirred out of his hometown of Gottigen (he found his job as a surveyor a painful distraction) and imagined space as "folded, bent and very strange".
The personalities of these men are contradictory as well; Humboldt the aristocrat was tolerant and given to forgiven the transgressions of fellow humans, Gauss -arrogant and given to sadistic jibes at others. Humboldt's preference for boys is hardly evident, while Gauss is debauched, sowing his seeds at random, as long as they don't interfere with his research.
Painting their lives in the background of Napoleanic wars and upheavals across Europe, gives Kehlmann a chance to contemporize - the futility of war was plainly evident then as now. Unlike most post-war German fiction, Measuring the World is witty, sending itself up on more than one occasion (novels -"the perfect way to capture the most fleeting essence of the present for the future"). The ending is deliciously ironic (in light of recent events) with Eugen (Gauss's son and butt of his cruelest jibes) rebelling against his father and sailing to the icon of a liberal world - the US!
Craftily written, well translated, Kehlmann's book is loaded with asides and observations that remain with us long after its two lead-men and their obsession with measurement has been given a rest.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
